|
|
@@ -1,18 +1,18 @@ |
|
|
|
Select among the @BAKEs in a file? |
|
|
|
This could be user-useful but would require an overhaul of the options. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specify the shell environment somehow? |
|
|
|
Specify the shell environment somehow? -- NOT NEEDED |
|
|
|
Could be nice, could be easy to implement with some different starter |
|
|
|
command, such as @BAKE_ENV /bin/sh [command ...], but the power of |
|
|
|
regular old /bin/sh alone should be enough for everything. Calling |
|
|
|
a script is perfectly practical considering the rooting facilities. |
|
|
|
Use Make or a script, this is nearing overkill. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enviromental variables? |
|
|
|
Enviromental variables? -- WORKS, NO CHANGES NEEDED |
|
|
|
No idea how the support is currently, should be fine. Anything more is |
|
|
|
overkill, use Make if you need ?= and $(XXX). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Longer @EMBEDDED_BAKE handle? |
|
|
|
Longer @EMBEDDED_BAKE handle? -- NOT NEEDED |
|
|
|
Possibly a good idea for large binary files, but I would rather just |
|
|
|
write the "Select among @BAKEs" feature than cheap out with an additional |
|
|
|
handle. Besides, this is only useful for a gimick autonomous compile |
|
|
@@ -21,11 +21,11 @@ to also include a @EMBEDDED_BAKE_ENV which is a little ridiculous. |
|
|
|
This will at best make me consider writing/using hashmaps, which would |
|
|
|
be a techinical improvement, but definitely is overkill. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More Macros? |
|
|
|
More Macros? -- NOT NEEDED |
|
|
|
Luckily, with the rewrite to expand, this would be very easy to add. |
|
|
|
But I don't know of any that wouldn't be overkill. If I ever think of |
|
|
|
any that would be substantially useful, I might add them. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kill globals. |
|
|
|
Kill globals. -- DONE |
|
|
|
I'd need to first isolate them into bake_expand, which is a bit of a |
|
|
|
pain but a thing I'll definitely do. |