From f5e88717b6f386a5777f743e9e3110a393ab0d87 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: murabito Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2020 09:54:23 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] fixed a typo in one of my earliest blog entries that was driving me up the wall ever since i noticed it --- .../2019-06-18-i-know-nothing-i-see-nothing-i-hear-nothing.markdown | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/_input/posts/2019-06-18-i-know-nothing-i-see-nothing-i-hear-nothing.markdown b/_input/posts/2019-06-18-i-know-nothing-i-see-nothing-i-hear-nothing.markdown index 1b462d2..0312b2d 100644 --- a/_input/posts/2019-06-18-i-know-nothing-i-see-nothing-i-hear-nothing.markdown +++ b/_input/posts/2019-06-18-i-know-nothing-i-see-nothing-i-hear-nothing.markdown @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ knowing it was there to *thinking that you knew* it was there. it wasn't knowledge, just an errant belief. to be able to truly know something (and i'm skipping a few steps -here), you must be able to logically prove it's truth with absolutely +here), you must be able to logically prove its truth with absolutely no possibility of error. pure logic assumes nothing. the closest thing to pure logic that i am aware of is maths. mathematics is based on six assumptions, for example: