Browse Source

Merge branch 'mass-follow-fixes' into 'develop'

User.follow_all: Respect blocks in both directions.

See merge request pleroma/pleroma!823
tags/v1.1.4
rinpatch 5 years ago
parent
commit
99f955cd9e
2 changed files with 6 additions and 3 deletions
  1. +2
    -2
      lib/pleroma/user.ex
  2. +4
    -1
      test/user_test.exs

+ 2
- 2
lib/pleroma/user.ex View File

@@ -311,12 +311,12 @@ defmodule Pleroma.User do
end
end

@doc "A mass follow for local users. Respects blocks but does not create activities."
@doc "A mass follow for local users. Respects blocks in both directions but does not create activities."
@spec follow_all(User.t(), list(User.t())) :: {atom(), User.t()}
def follow_all(follower, followeds) do
followed_addresses =
followeds
|> Enum.reject(fn %{ap_id: ap_id} -> ap_id in follower.info.blocks end)
|> Enum.reject(fn followed -> blocks?(follower, followed) || blocks?(followed, follower) end)
|> Enum.map(fn %{follower_address: fa} -> fa end)

q =


+ 4
- 1
test/user_test.exs View File

@@ -55,18 +55,21 @@ defmodule Pleroma.UserTest do
followed_two = insert(:user)
blocked = insert(:user)
not_followed = insert(:user)
reverse_blocked = insert(:user)

{:ok, user} = User.block(user, blocked)
{:ok, reverse_blocked} = User.block(reverse_blocked, user)

{:ok, user} = User.follow(user, followed_zero)

{:ok, user} = User.follow_all(user, [followed_one, followed_two, blocked])
{:ok, user} = User.follow_all(user, [followed_one, followed_two, blocked, reverse_blocked])

assert User.following?(user, followed_one)
assert User.following?(user, followed_two)
assert User.following?(user, followed_zero)
refute User.following?(user, not_followed)
refute User.following?(user, blocked)
refute User.following?(user, reverse_blocked)
end

test "follow_all follows mutliple users without duplicating" do


Loading…
Cancel
Save