|
|
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ knowing it was there to *thinking that you knew* it was there. it |
|
|
|
wasn't knowledge, just an errant belief. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to be able to truly know something (and i'm skipping a few steps |
|
|
|
here), you must be able to logically prove it's truth with absolutely |
|
|
|
here), you must be able to logically prove its truth with absolutely |
|
|
|
no possibility of error. pure logic assumes nothing. the closest thing |
|
|
|
to pure logic that i am aware of is maths. mathematics is based on six |
|
|
|
assumptions, for example: |
|
|
|